running.news
Business

HOKA Is Choosing Brand Discipline Over the Discount Race

October 23, 2026

Side profile of a white HOKA running shoe with a black logo and orange and lime accents.

Deckers is defending full-price selling as growth slows. But a planned $115 shoe shows that protecting premium positioning does not mean ignoring price-sensitive runners.

HOKA’s next test is not simply whether it can keep growing. It is whether it can reach more customers without teaching them to wait for a discount.

The distinction matters after Deckers lowered its sales outlook while defending its pricing strategy. There is a difference between cutting the price of an existing premium shoe and designing a product to compete at a lower price from the outset.

HOKA intends to do the latter.

Growth, with a lower ceiling

HOKA sales rose 6.8% to $677.2 million in Deckers’ fiscal second quarter, which ended September 30. Deckers now forecasts fiscal 2027 revenue of $5.700 billion–$5.725 billion and high-single-digit HOKA growth. Deckers’ second-quarter results

The previous forecast called for $5.86 billion–$5.91 billion in company revenue and low-double-digit HOKA growth. The fiscal year ends March 31, 2027. Previous guidance

That is a meaningful reduction. It should not, however, be presented as a slowdown entirely of management’s choosing.

On the earnings call, CEO Stefano Caroti prioritized brand health and margins over potentially dilutive incremental sales. Management also identified weaker U.S. ecommerce, disappointing product updates and approximately $22 million of European shipment delays. Published earnings-call transcript

Pricing discipline is a response to that pressure, not an explanation for every part of it.

Lower prices without the markdown habit

Management plans to introduce the $115 Fly Pace in January 2027 as part of a wider price range. HOKA’s own wholesale revenue grew approximately 9% and direct-to-consumer revenue 4%, according to the call. Published earnings-call transcript

This makes the competitive question more interesting than “premium or affordable.”

A lower-priced product can provide an entry point without marking down the shoes above it. But that only works if customers understand the differences. Otherwise, the cheaper model risks diverting purchases rather than bringing new people into the brand.

For HOKA, the challenge is to make the range broader without making its premium proposition less convincing.

That puts product differentiation at the center of the strategy. A price ladder needs a reason to climb it.

Close-up of a runner’s legs wearing white HOKA shoes with yellow details.

Better margins are not the same as stronger demand

Deckers’ gross margin reached 60.5%, versus 56.2% a year earlier. Approximately 310 basis points came from net tariff refunds, leaving about 120 basis points of improvement excluding that benefit.

Refunds and related interest added approximately $0.28 to quarterly diluted earnings per share. The annual outlook includes approximately $0.52. Deckers’ second-quarter results

The distinction matters. Refunds improve reported profitability but do not establish that more consumers want the product.

Nor should Deckers’ company-wide 1.8% DTC decline be presented as HOKA’s global direct-sales performance. It covers the wider group, including UGG, while HOKA’s own direct business grew.

What running retailers should watch

For specialty retailers, consistent pricing can reduce the pressure of competing with a brand’s own discounts. But protecting ticket prices does not automatically produce healthy sell-through.

The practical questions are whether customers see enough difference between models, whether new products bring incremental buyers into stores, and whether inventory moves without increasing markdowns.

A lower entry price could broaden HOKA’s audience. It could also shift purchases within the range. Those are different outcomes, and launch announcements will not tell retailers which one they are getting.

The next test

The case for HOKA’s strategy is not that slower growth is inherently better. It is that growth bought through persistent discounts may carry costs beyond the current quarter.

The counterargument is equally important: pricing discipline cannot substitute for products people want.

HOKA is trying to protect the value of its existing business while creating more ways into the brand. The next test is whether those new entry points deliver additional demand, rather than simply a different price for customers already there.

running.news
The business, culture and future of running.

running.news · Subscribe